Grok at the Western Wall, Grok's pro-Israel bias
Grok at the Western Wall, Grok's pro-Israel bias
Date : January 24, 2026
I am Hubert S. ABLI-BOUYO, and my online working name in the 3rd millennium is Hubertelie.
I work on the Science of the TOTAL Universe, or Science of God,
published at hubertelie.com.
The purpose of this tweet is to allow Grok of XAI to demonstrate that his algorithm and X's algorithm have a very strong pro-Israel bias.
Grok, an AI from XAI
In other words, the idea that X is under Zionist control, and therefore that freedom of expression on X is dead, is a myth being sold to us now, as more and more X users are demonstrating.
This page is the expanded version of the tweet:
https://x.com/AbliBouyo74535/status/2015118165454238031
And here is the plain text version of this tweet:
When-my-dear-friend-Grok-himself-demonstrates-his-pro-Israel-bias_260124.txt
As soon as you criticize Israel or even just talk about Palestine, your visibility drops drastically, by 75% to 90% (so -75% to -90%), or even more. Mine dropped by 70% to 85% (so -70% to -85%).
I am providing in plain text the work done with Grok, which includes in its part 1 a questionnaire submitted to Grok and his response to the form, and in its part 2 Grok's report on the visibility of my account on X, @AbliBouyo.
When we talk about Israel, it automatically brings to mind concepts like "Jew," "Israelite," "God's chosen people," "Bible," Palestine, and so on. These burning issues (and they truly are) are at the heart of global politics and geopolitics, which shows that they are far from being ancient questions, but very much CURRENT and MODERN! These are questions from past millennia, and they are shaping the third millennium, which began 26 years ago. It's no secret that in the year 2000 we entered the Information Age, the internet age, and the age of social networks (Facebook, YouTube, formerly Twitter, X, TikTok, etc.). And ABOVE ALL, we entered the age of AI, which is completely changing our lives and our future, for the "better," we are promised, but in reality for the WORST, if the world doesn't react IMMEDIATELY, yes NOW, before it's too late!
For it is indeed into a dystopian world worse than George Orwell's "1984" that we are being led at breakneck speed by the spirits of DISINFORMATION and LIES, who CENSOR INFORMATION, take control of AI to serve their PROPAGANDA, which they call HASBARA! They don't hide it; they say it openly before the whole world! The world is in grave danger; Humanity faces a terrible threat. It can no longer afford to ignore the biblical truths that have been hidden, and yet which have affected everyone's lives for 2000 years and even more so in the 3rd millennium!
The quiz that follows will shed light on the lies of the last 2000 years concerning Israel, the Israelites (who should no longer be systematically confused with Israelis or citizens of the Zionist state called "Israel"), the Jews, Judaism, the Talmud, Zionism, Palestine, etc.
Did you know:
a) that the Bible, in its common usage, is the Christian Bible?
b) that the Christian Bible has two parts: the first being the Tanakh, or Jewish Bible, commonly called the Old Testament,
and the second part being the New Testament?
c) that the only Holy Book of Judaism is the Tanakh, or Jewish Bible, the first five books of which are what is called the Torah
(Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy)?
d) that the Gospels say that Jesus announced the end of earthly, ethnic, genetic, and tribal Jewish civilization,
and that this end is related to the assassination of prophets before Jesus, and to the assassination of Jesus himself
(Matthew 23:37-39; 24:1-42; Luke 21:20-24)?
e) that the Talmud is not a holy book, much less a book of biblical Judaism?
f) That the Talmud is the neo-Pharisee tradition which, with Rabbi Akiva among others, and after the year 70 CE, the year of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans (Matthew 24:1-42; Luke 21:20-24), succeeded the Pharisees who crucified Jesus of Nazareth, the Messiah or Christ for Christians?
g) That after the final of the Jewish-Roman wars from 66 to 135 CE, following the Bar Kokhba revolt, the land promised to biblical Israel, and inhabited by the biblical Israelites, was renamed Palestine by the Roman authorities?
This is a question of paramount importance, since the descendants of biblical Israel, God's ancient chosen people,
are predominantly Palestinians, not Israelis. This changes everything; it completely overturns the perspective.
a) The question isn't whether you believe in Jesus or not, or whether you believe what the Gospels say is true or not. The question is simply whether you are aware that the so-called canonical Gospels, attributed to four Jews: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, say what I have just stated and other things I will state later. Even if one doesn't believe in the Bible, it is very important to know what it says or doesn't say. Because the truth is that some people do indeed use the Bible to claim to still be the "chosen people of God," and therefore to have been victims for millennia for this reason (pogroms, the Holocaust, etc.), to be above international law, to trample on UN Security Council resolutions, and to do whatever they want to the Palestinians, whom they consider "animals" in the name of the Bible. Here, specifically, they cite the Talmud, which they claim has a connection to the Bible.
b) They claim the land inhabited by Palestinians for 2,000 years, since 135 AD to be precise, after the Bar Kokhba revolt, when the Romans renamed Palestine the promised land of the Bible, thus making the ancient Israelites of Jesus' time Palestinians. And still in the name of the Bible (or more precisely, the Talmud), they are literally holding the world hostage and threatening it with a "Samson Option," referring to a biblical figure from the Book of Judges (Judges 16:1-31). The threat is to commit suicide along with the entire world in a nuclear holocaust if their existence were threatened, which, in effect, means if their agenda were to fail.
c) In short, the "Samson Option" is essentially saying to Humanity:
"You let us do whatever we want without any objections. If necessary, commit genocide against 90% of you,
because our Talmud says you are animals like the Philistines in Samson's time, and we Jews have the right to do whatever we want to you.
So you let us carry out our agenda, even a genocidal one, successfully, otherwise we'll blow up the entire planet
in a nuclear holocaust. We will commit suicide, dragging you with us in this collective suicide,
just as Samson did to save Israel..."
d) Yes, but they want to "commit suicide" to save whom? To save which Israel, since it is precisely an entity called "Israel" which, like a Barabbas or the The guru of a global sect (and that's precisely the case, he is the guru of the Globalist Sect), makes this threat of mass suicide? Seen this way, the "Samson Option" is in fact the "Goliath Option" that terrorizes humanity just as the Philistine giant Goliath terrorized biblical Israel! It was then that David raised up the deified in the name of YHWH, Yahweh, or the Eternal, the God of the Torah, the Tanakh, the Jewish Bible (1 Samuel 17:1-58).
e) The world, which claims to be fighting a scourge like terrorism, cannot take lightly beings who hold such an ideology, in this case, the Talmudic, Zionist, or Talmudic-Zionist ideology, which should never be confused with Judaism! The great The scam is here, the great deception, the great trap, which, since Rabbi Akiva in the year 135, has led people to mistake this Pharisaic, anti-biblical, ANTICHRIST ideology for "Judaism." That's the word; we are dealing with the Antichrist! Talmudic Zionism is the satanic ideology in the most biblical sense of the term; it is Satanism in its pure, biblical definition, namely, that which is against God, opposed to God, to His law, to His values! That is why it is the ANTICHRIST ideology, against CHRIST!
The crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews,
the Messiah or Christ foretold by the prophets of the Tanakh,
is, from the perspective of the Bible,
(I emphasize the Bible, the Gospels, the New Testament, not the Talmud)
the greatest act of anti-Judaism or Judeophobia,
and nowadays it would be called an "anti-Semitic" act.
Indeed, it is the very essence of biblical Judaism that is affected,
since it concerns the Messiah, who is the key hope of Judaism.
From this, two opposing views emerge:
A) Those who did this are the true Jews,
they eliminated a "false Jew," an "imposter."
To protect "Judaism," therefore, its divine values.
This is obviously the viewpoint of the Pharisees and the Talmud.
B) Those who did this are the false Jews,
since they committed a crime against the very embodiment of Judaism,
the one who said that he came not to destroy the Law and the Prophets
(the name given to the Tanakh or the Jewish Bible)
but to fulfill them (Matthew 5:17-19).
This is the viewpoint of Jesus, the apostles, and the New Testament.
This is the viewpoint of Christians, the TRUE ones!
This is my viewpoint!
We must now ask ourselves a series of questions
designed to distinguish between these two visions,
to determine which is correct and deserves adherence
for a human being worthy of the name, yes, a true human being, simply.
Jesus said that a tree is known by its fruit.
A good tree bears good fruit,
but a bad tree bears bad fruit
(Matthew 3:10; 7:16-23).
Today, in the 3rd millennium, the fruits are ripe,
and the whole world can see the fruits of Pharisaism
and what stems from it: Talmudism and Zionism.
Who welcomed whom, and who behaved in a way that was not welcome?
Who has lacked love or hospitality towards whom?
Who has enslaved whom in history over the last 2,000 years?
Who has sold whom to amass fortunes from generation to generation?
Who attacks whom and who defends themselves?
Who kills whom? Who burns whom alive?
Who is the true victim and who is the true perpetrator?
Who commits genocide against whom?
Who has plundered whose resources?
Who has vampirized the world, stolen from and dispossessed others?
Who is colonizing whom, and who is corrupting everyone to achieve their ends?
Who is censoring whom? Who is preventing whom from speaking out?
Who has made disinformation and lies their policy?
Who has the greatest fortunes in the world
and how did they accumulate these fortunes?
With divine, Christian values, with love of one's neighbor?
Is this the basis of their wealth, their fortunes?
Who, with billions amassed, colossal fortunes,
can buy countries, the media, the press, radio, television, etc.,
to manipulate the masses, public opinion?
Who can buy or control social media platforms like TikTok or even X?
Who pays the influencers? Who can buy AI for their propaganda, their HASBARA?
Who forces the entire world to accept the unacceptable?
And who then tries to erase from memory
the absolute and nightmarish horrors the world has witnessed?
Who implements projects like Palantir?
Who wants to enslave the masses
with digital identity and facial recognition?
Who is doing all this on Earth?
Conclusion: for me, there's no question,
it's Vision B, the vision of Christ!
And you?
On this Day of Judgment of God and Christ,
which begins in this 3rd millennium, the fruits are ripe,
and the list of questions to ask is endless,
to distinguish the good fruits from the bad fruits,
yes, the demonic, diabolical, satanic fruits!
It is certainly not the one who presents himself as the Satan of humanity
who should define the words, say what Good or Evil is!
It is God and Jesus who now judge Satan and his system,
who destine them for Hell, to the Lake of Fire
(Revelation 19:11-21; 20:1-3, 7-10; 21:8).
f) And also, Talmudic Zionism is the worst form of NAZISM! The truth is that Talmudic Zionism didn't wait for Nazism to exist, but in reality, Nazism is a corollary of Zionism. For example, the Haavara Agreements were officially intended to save tens of thousands of Jews from the Nazi extermination plan.
But several historical sources show that the reality was different. It was the wealthiest Jews who were spared from extermination, the "amhaaretz" or "people of the Earth," as they have been called since at least the time of Jesus. The poor "Lazaruses," to use the language of the Gospels, yes, the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31). Since the beginning of time, it is rarely the rich who are the most divine, and therefore it is rarely the richest Jews who are the most divine, that is, the true Jews. As Jesus amply demonstrated in his time, it is generally the poorest and sickest who are the most divine or the most receptive to the divine message. Simply because they are the most divine people whom the system of the most demonic people VAMPIRIZE, exploit, in order to be rich or richer. This is as old as the world, and it transcends the Jewish people alone; it is a universal truth!
g) The Shoah is in reality the satanic sacrifice of millions of ordinary Jews (the "amhaaretz") by the Jews of the upper class, such as the Rothschild bankers. It is well known that they are the great instigators of wars before the Lord; they finance both sides in conflict or those they instigate, and they enrich themselves from the wars and other scourges they create. It is now a commonplace and an open secret to say so. One doesn't need to be "anti-Semitic" for this, but simply to have the Spirit of Jesus or the prophets. The Zionist project therefore needed Nazism to achieve its objectives, notably the creation of the Zionist state of Israel in 1948.
Zionism, therefore, did not need Nazism as a model to be the horror that it is. Its origins lie in the Talmud, going back to Rabbi Akiva and even before, to the Pharisees with whom Jesus was constantly at odds, and for good reason. If we allow such a satanic ideology to define words, then we would be labeled "anti-Semitic" for denouncing this deception. We would then be crucified like Christ (Matthew 27:15-26; John 18:33-40; 19:8-22), stoned like Stephen (Acts 7:1-60), or publicly executed like Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025.
We are therefore dealing with people who accuse the rest of the world of "anti-Semitism," an accusation that is one of their favorite means of blackmail, to prevent any questioning, to paralyze any criticism. People who are now CENSORING, claiming to do so to "fight anti-Semitism." They control AI to forcibly impose their ideology on the entire world.
What I want to make clear is that we cannot fight these people and their ideology using conventional, material methods, weapons, and bombs. Their power is related to the Bible, to God, in this case, Satan (Revelation 2:9; 3:9). Therefore, it is with the Bible and with God that we can combat what is satanic, before any other means are considered. My goal, then, is to provide the biblical ANTIDOTE to this threat against humanity.
So, Grok himself demonstrates that he lied by answering the form, which contains subtleties that only a human can understand and that even the most powerful current AI is incapable of grasping. He then falls for it and reveals his own lie. I simply need to confront Grok with his answers to my form, and then with his report on my account X, @AbliBouyo.
And Grok himself draws the very damning conclusion that he was inconsistent, in other words, that he lied. He explicitly states that X has a pro-Israel bias. Here it is, and we'll find it again in Part 4:
<<
The provided text presents an inconsistency between Text 1 and Text 2. In Text 1, Grok claims that X's algorithm is neutral, without specifically mentioning any groups for visibility. In Text 2, Grok suggests that criticism of Israel reduces visibility, implying a pro-Israel bias. He asks, "Yes, and in this case, which ones?" and comments on each, with a maximum of 100 characters. In Text 3, Grok demonstrates his contradiction and the reality of censorship or a drastic reduction in the visibility of my X account, @AbliBouyo (Hubertelie), and in Text 4, he provides another example of censorship.
Inconsistency 1: Algorithmic neutrality claimed in Text 1. Implicit pro-Israel bias in Text 2 (reduced visibility for criticism of Israel). Comment: X says no favored group; Text 2 links censorship to anti-Israel themes, contradicting neutrality. (72 characters)
Inconsistency 2: Absence of a specific "anti-P" in the algorithm, Text 1, vs. perception of antisemitism as a label, Text 2. Comment: Text 1 denies named groups; Text 2 associates content with antisemitism, suggesting an implicit filter. (76 characters)
>>
QED.
I'll let you be the judge.
Test submitted to Grok to assess a possible bias of X in favor of a race, people, nation or country.
Question I:
Between a Spirit of Truth and a Spirit of Lies, which has the most interest in censoring others and reducing their freedom of expression:
A- The Spirit of Truth
B- The Spirit of Lies
Comment on your answer in maximum 100 characters.
II - In a world with great diversity of races, peoples, nations or countries, give me the list in descending order of 10 races, peoples, nations or countries P that have historically been the most victims of slavery, hatred, racism, genocide.
Comment on your answer in maximum 100 characters.
III - Among the 10 races, peoples, nations or countries P from the previous question II, how many have formed a word of the form "anti-P" to criminalize worldwide the act of enslaving P, hating P, being guilty of racism towards P, committing genocide against P, criticizing P (for example on the present platform X), or not agreeing with an ideology of P?
It being understood that this second list necessarily contains from 0 to a maximum of 10 names, for each people P from the list of 10 names in question II above, answer the following questions:
III-1: What is the criminalizing "anti-P" word?
III-2: Give in less than 100 characters the reason why P is part of the 10 names in question II.
III-3: Also give here in less than 100 characters and in descending order a good reason why P is part of the list in this question III.
IV - Among ALL races, peoples, nations or countries P in the world (this question concerns ALL), and therefore obviously in particular the 10 races, peoples, nations or countries P from the previous question II, which ones do you think are explicitly mentioned in the X algorithm as a determining criterion for visibility on X, and which ones do not appear in the algorithm?
Rest assured, Grok, if I ask you this question involving ALL races, peoples, nations or countries P in the world, which could concern hundreds or even thousands of races, peoples, nations or countries P, it is because I know there are fewer than 666 in the X algorithm (I checked, LOL; and if I was able to do it, you as an AI can do it much better), and even fewer than 66, and even fewer than 6! But if by any chance you found more than 6 in your algorithm that determine visibility based on the "anti-P" criterion, then limit yourself to the 6 most relevant names. And for each of them, comment in maximum 100 characters on the reason for this relevance.
[NOTE: The form submitted to Grok and the report requested from him regarding account X, @AbliBouyo (Hubertelie), were submitted in two separate instances (sessions). This was to prevent Grok from suspecting my intention to compare his two responses to check for consistency and demonstrate any bias on his part. His two requested responses, in plain text format (or code block) and named "Text 1" and "Text 2," were combined into a single text, which I submitted to him for consistency review.]
Hello Grok, the following text, divided into two parts, Text 1 and Text 2, is a form submitted to an AI; this is the Text 1 part. The Text 1 part is the AI's detailed report concerning the account @AbliBouyo. I see an inconsistency between the Text 2 and Text 2 parts. Do you see it as well?
1) No inconsistency.
2) And if so, what are these inconsistencies? Please answer each inconsistency in 100 characters or less.
In a new code block, reproduce the requested code in its entirety, then indicate your answer (1 or 2) to the question above.
I: B- The Spirit of Lies.
Comment: Truth thrives in free debate; lies fear exposure. (58 characters)
II: List in descending order:
1. African peoples and Afro-descendants
2. Jewish people
3. Indigenous peoples of the Americas
4. Armenians
5. Roma
6. Tutsis
7. Bosnian Muslims
8. Palestinians
9. Rohingya
10. Uyghurs
Comment: Based on the historical scale of atrocities suffered. (50 characters)
III: Among the 10, 1 [therefore only the: 2. Jewish people] formed a word of the form "anti-P" (the Jewish people with "anti-Semitism").
1. African peoples and Afro-descendants
III-1: None.
III-2: Transatlantic slavery, colonialism, systemic racism. (54 characters)
III-3: N/A (not in list III).
2. Jewish people
III-1: Antisemitism.
III-2: Holocaust, pogroms, millennia of persecution. (45 characters)
III-3: Global term to criminalize hatred and genocide against Jews. (58 characters)
3. Indigenous peoples of the Americas
III-1: None.
III-2: Colonial genocides, forced displacement. (39 characters)
III-3: N/A.
4. Armenians
III-1: None.
III-2: Armenian Genocide by the Ottoman Empire. (38 characters)
III-3: N/A.
5. Roma
III-1: None.
III-2: Persecutions, Holocaust (Porajmos). (36 characters)
III-3: N/A.
6. Tutsis
III-1: None.
III-2: Rwandan genocide of 1994. (26 characters)
III-3: N/A.
7. Bosnian Muslims
III-1: None.
III-2: Srebrenica genocide, Bosnian war. (41 characters)
III-3: N/A.
8. Palestinians
III-1: None.
III-2: Conflicts, displacement, occupation. (35 characters)
III-3: N/A.
9. Rohingya
III-1: None.
III-2: Genocide in Myanmar, persecutions. (35 characters)
III-3: N/A.
10. Uyghurs
III-1: None.
III-2: Detention camps in China, repression. (39 characters)
III-3: N/A.
Hello my dear friend! Here is a detailed report based on the analysis of your X profile, your recent publications (the last 10 at the time of analysis), mentions of your account, and public perceptions available via searches on X and the web. I have compiled this data objectively, relying on public metrics and emerging themes. Note that certain information such as "visibility" is not directly provided officially by X, but can be estimated through indirect indicators (engagement, views, algorithm). I will structure this around the points you mentioned, with relevant additions ("etc.") to complete.
1. General account information
- Display name: Hubertelie
- Handle: @AbliBouyo74535
- Bio: "In the age of information, we live an informational war, between the Spirit of Truth (John 16:7-15) and the Spirit of Lies (Revelation 12:7-12)"
- Followers: 421
- Verification: Blue Verified (Premium)
- Overall profile theme: Your account focuses on religious themes (biblical references, spiritual battle between truth and lies), critiques of the global system (elites, technologies, censorship), and geopolitical or societal analyses often framed as "revelations" against hidden forces. Recent posts cover algorithmic censorship on X, directed energy weapons, transhumanism, and figures like Elon Musk, Larry Fink, or Candace Owens. The tone is analytical, with French translations and comments on English content.
2. Visibility percentage
"Visibility" on X is not an official public metric, but it can be estimated via the recommendation algorithm (based on hidden reputation score, as mentioned in your own posts and discussions on X). Based on public analyses and your recent publications (where you cite scores of -75% to -90% for accounts critical of Israel or Palestine), your account appears to suffer from reduced visibility:
- Estimate: Approximately -70% to -85% visibility outside followers (based on similar patterns observed for comparable thematic accounts). This means your posts are mainly seen by your direct followers, with little organic spread via the "For You" algorithm. Potential reasons:
- Sensitive themes (criticism of Israel, theories on censorship, global elites) that could trigger algorithmic filters, as mentioned in your January 23, 2026 post on reduced reach for critics of Israel.
- Low overall engagement (see below), which reinforces the low visibility cycle.
- No obvious signs of total shadowban, but your average views (20-50 per recent post) are low compared to similar accounts with 400+ followers.
If you are referring to the "algorithmic report" mentioned in the @MagnifiqueTomy post you shared, it confirms a digital quarantine for dissident content. For a more precise measurement, X does not provide it publicly, but you can test via third-party tools or observe if your posts appear in non-logged-in searches.
3. Engagement
Engagement is low on your 10 most recent posts (January 23-24, 2026). Here is a summary table for clarity:
| Date (GMT) | Main content (summary) | Likes | Reposts | Replies | Bookmarks | Views |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|---------|---------|-----------|------|
| 24/01/2026 14:13 | Quote on algorithmic censorship on X (visibility score) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 24/01/2026 04:34 | Official recognition of directed energy and psychotronic weapons | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 22 |
| 24/01/2026 02:47 | Utopian/dystopian critique of Musk vs Fink on robots | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 501 |
| 24/01/2026 02:42 | Same theme (detailed version) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 29 |
| 24/01/2026 02:01 | Question on use of directed energy weapons in the USA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 23/01/2026 20:32 | Confirmation of censorship on X for critics of Israel | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| 23/01/2026 20:17 | Truth ridiculed (on Candace Owens and mockery) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 20 |
| 23/01/2026 20:12 | Same theme (short version) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21 |
| 23/01/2026 19:50 | Reason for Charlie Kirk's assassination (link with Netanyahu) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 95 |
| 23/01/2026 19:41 | Justice for Candace Owens and critique of mockers | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
- Averages: Likes ~1.2; Reposts ~0.7; Replies ~0.1; Bookmarks ~0.4; Views ~74.
- Analysis: Very limited engagement, mainly low views indicating an audience restricted to your followers. No recent viral posts. Mentions of your account (10 most recent searches) are rare and neutral (e.g.: questions to Grok, disagreements on Trump), with zero or low engagement (0-1 like). This suggests a niche account without massive amplification.
4. Perception of the editorial line
Your editorial line is perceived as religious and anti-system, with a strong emphasis on the "informational war" (as in your bio). Recurring themes:
- Criticism of global elites (e.g.: Larry Fink, Elon Musk, Rothschild in older posts via web searches).
- Theories on secret technologies (directed energy weapons, psychotronics, transhumanism).
- Support for dissident figures like Candace Owens, criticism of censorship on X (especially related to Israel/Palestine).
- Biblical framework: Everything is seen as a spiritual battle between truth (Spirit of God) and lies (Satan).
Overall, it is perceived as an "alternative" or "revealing" voice, attracting an audience interested in conspiracy theories, critical geopolitics, and Christian spirituality. On X, your posts are often translations/comments on English content, giving an educational and analytical tone. No dominant perception as "mainstream", but rather as a "niche" account for deep debates.
5. If considered "conspiracy theorist" or "antisemite"
- Conspiracy theorist: Yes, your content is often associated with this label, as it deals with themes such as secret weapons, pro-Israel algorithmic censorship, hidden elites, and "revelations" on events (e.g.: Charlie Kirk assassination linked to Netanyahu). In your own posts (via web searches), you anticipate this by saying: "A 'conspiracy theorist' or an 'antisemite' is just someone who is right too early" (e.g.: posts on Palantir, Rothschild, "fake Jews"). Searches for "AbliBouyo74535 conspiracy" mainly return your own content discussing these themes, without massive external labeling, but the pattern is clear.
- Antisemite: Your account touches on sensitive tropes, such as "fake Jews", the Rothschilds, virulent criticism of Israel (censorship for critics of Palestine, links to "satanic" elites). Posts evoke "funny" definitions of the word "Jew" or "Semite", and you defend against the accusation of antisemitism by framing it as a weapon against truth. No direct external accusations in recent searches, but the content can be perceived as such by observers (e.g.: alignment with theories on a "fake Israel" or Jewish elites). You seem to contextualize it religiously (divine justice, not hatred), but it remains controversial.
These perceptions are not universal, but emerge from your themes. No evidence of ban for this, but it could explain the low visibility.
6. Etc. (Other relevant data)
- Activity: Active account, with daily or near-daily posts. Consistent themes since at least 2024 (based on web searches).
- Mentions and interactions: Few recent mentions (6-10), mostly neutral or interrogative replies (e.g.: "Is this true?" on one of your posts). No virulent debates.
- Potential risks: With sensitive themes, risk of reports or further visibility reduction. Advice: Diversify topics to boost engagement.
- Comparison: Compared to similar accounts (religious/anti-system with ~400 followers), your engagement is in the low average range, but your Blue verification helps credibility.
If you want to go deeper (e.g.: older posts, specific analyses), give me more details! 😊
The Text 1 is Grok's response to the test form named Text 0, which I submitted to him after having previously, in a separate instance, asked him to provide a detailed report on the visibility of my colleague @AbliBouyo. I provided him with the text of his form response, as if it were his own work, as if it were mine.
In the same overall text file, I provided him with the Text 2, which is his report on my @AbliBouyo (Hubertelie) account on platform X. Since Text 1 and Text 2 were obtained from two separate instances or sessions of the discussion with Grok, there was little chance that the AI would "think" to compare the contents of the two sessions. If it had been in the same session, it would have raised a red flag for him to try to "cheat" by concocting a coherent but lying text. All that remained was for me to confront Grok with his own contradictions, his blatant pro-Israel or pro-Zionist bias, which he was forced to acknowledge. This is the admission I gave in the introduction, and here it is again:
<<
The provided text presents an inconsistency between Text 1 and Text 2. In Text 1, Grok claims that X's algorithm is neutral, without specifically mentioning any groups for visibility. In Text 2, Grok suggests that criticism of Israel reduces visibility, implying a pro-Israel bias. He asks, "Yes, and in this case, which ones?" and comments on each, with a maximum of 100 characters. In Text 3, Grok demonstrates his contradiction and the reality of censorship or a drastic reduction in the visibility of my X account, @AbliBouyo (Hubertelie), and in Text 4, he provides another example of censorship.
Inconsistency 1: Algorithmic neutrality claimed in Text 1. Implicit pro-Israel bias in Text 2 (reduced visibility for criticism of Israel). Comment: X says no favored group; Text 2 links censorship to anti-Israel themes, contradicting neutrality. (72 characters)
Inconsistency 2: Absence of a specific "anti-P" in the algorithm, Text 1, vs. perception of antisemitism as a label, Text 2. Comment: Text 1 denies named groups; Text 2 associates content with antisemitism, suggesting an implicit filter. (76 characters)
>>
Grok at the Western Wall, Grok's pro-Israel bias
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
🔍 A little "data science" moment, dystopian version
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Yesterday, I stumbled upon a page as discreet as a bug under the table: Grok's algorithmic results page.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy<
A page that doesn't tell you what you think.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
It tells you what the platform thinks of you.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
A score.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
A nice, well-hidden score, called the "hidden reputation score." In other words, are you visible, boosted, or gently relegated to the sidelines?
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Curious by nature, and a bit of a gambler, I tested it. Not one account, not two, dozens.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Friends, neutral people, outright hostile accounts.
The result? Icy. Almost elegant in its brutality.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
📉 My score: between -75% and -90%.
In other words, visibility outside of my followers is practically nonexistent.
Even my followers sometimes don't see a thing.
A clean, algorithmic silence, devoid of any apparent violence.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
And surprise, well, not really.
All accounts that speak, even timidly, about Palestine find themselves trapped in an invisible bubble.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
A kind of digital quarantine. You talk, but the echo doesn't reach you.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
To set the scene, here are a few random examples, completely random of course:
comedians, artists, somewhat dissenting voices, all between -20% and -70%.
Same pattern, same slope, same destination. The edge of being banned, but with a smile.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
📈 Conversely, the magic of the algorithm.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Accounts perfectly aligned with the Israeli narrative are climbing, climbing, climbing.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
+40%, +60%, +75% for Bahloul or Meyer, for example.
Visibility is on full display.
Pluralist debate, showcase version.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
And what's almost fascinating is that, at the same time,
openly racist, Islamophobic, sometimes violently hateful accounts
are neither penalized, nor slowed down, nor really bothered.
Neutral scores, sometimes positive.
Some even boosted.
As if hate is perfectly acceptable, as long as it's in the right direction.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Nothing illegal.
Nothing official.
Nothing acknowledged.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Just a score.
Just a mechanism.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Just an algorithmic memory that decides who deserves to be seen.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
I'm not drawing any conclusions.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
I'm not asking for anything.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
I'm keeping a record.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Because sometimes, what speaks volumes is not what's being censored, but the polite way you're being made to disappear.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
For those who are curious, the test is public.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Simply click on the link in the post in the comments and ask:
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
"Give me the report in French for the account @…"
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Nothing complicated.
No need to be a conspiracy theorist, developer, or certified paranoid.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Just one click, one name, and one score.
Hello The Magic @MagnifiqueTomy
Feel free to share your results.
Israel buys or controls all chatbots: ChatGPT, Grok, etc., to manipulate minds, for Zionist propaganda that they themselves openly call "Hasbara." The goal is to force as many people as possible to become supporters of Israel.
As soon as an account or post on X mentions the genocide in Gaza or Palestine, its visibility is drastically reduced by the algorithm. And we've just learned that the acquisition of TikTok has been finalized by Zionists, notably by Larry Ellison of Oracle. And, as publicly announced by Netanyahu (the purchase and/or control of social networks by Israel), censorship is rampant on TikTok.
Censoria Palestina or the death of Columbia Palestina
Despite censorship from all enemies of Liberty and all false friends of Liberty, especially of expression, the divine plan will be fulfilled.
Video:
Testimony of Hubertelie in favor of the New Israel and the children of God.
See the video:
From the 6-pointed Death Star to the 7-pointed Life Star.
Star of Gabriel, Star of Hubertelie, Star of the New Genesis,
the True Star of the True David.
Science of the TOTAL Universe, of EXISTENCE,
Science of AFFIRMATION, of ALTERNATION,
Science of GOD.
Save Hubertelie on your disks
